Remarkables Properties of the Eddington Number 137 and Electric Parameter 137.036 excluding the Multiverse Hypothesis

Considering that the Large Eddington Number has correctly predicted the number of atoms in the Universe, the properties of the Eddington electric number 137 are studied. This number shows abnormal arithmetic properties, in liaison with canonic numbers of the string and superstring theories including overwhelming relations with musical canonic numbers. The liaison with the harmonic series is so tight that it seems that Egyptians was aware of them, as the architecture of the Hypostyle Karnak room reveals. The direct liaison between the mean value of two Universe radiuses and the Bohr radius through the simplest harmonic series excludes any role of chance. It is concluded that the Cosmos is a finite computer using 137 and its extension 137.036 as calculation basis. 1. The Large Eddington Number: the most astonishing prediction in Physics of all times Eddington believed he had identified an algebraic basis for fundamental physics, which he termed "E-numbers" (representing a certain group– a Clifford algebra). These in effect incorporated spacetime into a higher-dimensional structure. While his theory has long been neglected by the general physics community, similar algebraic notions underlie many modern attempts at a grand unified theory. Moreover, Eddington's emphasis on the values of the fundamental constants, and specifically upon dimensionless numbers derived from them, is nowadays a central concern of physics. In particular, he predicted a number of hydrogen atoms in the Universe [1] 136 x 2256, or equivalently the half of the total number of particles protons + electrons. When equalized with the non-dark energy equivalent number of hydrogen atoms (the factor 10/3 is trivial in the simplest cosmology [2]) NH = (3/10) Rc2/GmH => R = 13.8 Glyr this corresponds to a Universe radius R = 13.8 Giga light year, a value predicted for years from universal constants using an atomic-cosmic symmetry [3], and compatible with c-times the socalled Universe age 13.80(4) Gyr, as determined by the recent mission Planck (March 2003). This formula traduces the double large number correlation in the manner Eddingon presented it, with lH = ħ/mH c: R/2lH ≈ √(M/me) ≈ ħc/Gmemp => R = 13.8 Glyr which implies directly the gravitational force in the Hydrogen atom [2]. The Eddington original form is R/2σ = √N, but Eddington was not able to deduces the above formula exhibiting the electron-proton symmetry, which was one of his essential hypothesis, because of the error of an order of magnitude of the first estimation of Lemaître for the redshift constant (an erroneous value strangely confirmed by Hubble et Humason). 2. Eddington and 137 Eddington has demonstrated [1] that, in reduced units, the square of electric charge must be 137. When it was precisely measured, it turned to be 137.036, and Eddington approach was rejected. This rejection is not conform with the traditional 'approach' method of physics. Indeed , there is a dircet relation bvetween these numbers: 1372 + π2 ≈ 137.0362 So, it is worth asking mathematician 'does 137 appear special in Number Theory?' The general answer is '137 is unknown in Number Theory, it has no remarkable property' This appear as a contradiction 'How can the Nature can be driven by mathematics, when appears a number unknown by mathematician ?' Two possible answers Multiverse Solution : Such an electrical constant is a random number, characterising a Universe among a multitude : it is the Multivers hypothesis. So the number is a completely 'free' number, and there is no need to look for any special mathematical properties. Universe Solution : 137 has special properties belonging to a part of mathematics undechifred by present mathematicians. We show here that the second way seems the right way 3. The largest primes in Harmonic Numbers Indeed, 137 is the 33ième prime number. Now the distribution of prime numbers is tied to the zéta Riemann function, itself a generalisation of the harmonis series (1/n). Now, let us decline the prime numbers emerging in numerators of this series: 3, 11, 5, 137, 7, 11, 761, 7129, 61, 863, 509, 919, 1117, 41233, 8431, 1138979, 39541, 7440427, 11167027, 18858053, 227, 583859, 467183, 312408463, 34395742267, 215087, 375035183, 4990290163, 17783, 2667653736673, 535919, 199539368321... Believe it or not, 137 appears as an arithmetic monster, not detected by our brillant mathematicians during a century ! One reason for this is that at the epoch of the mathematical fundators, the number 137 was not revealed by physical measurements. And after 137 was finally revealed by physics, modern mathematicians generally do not care with physics. In fact, the above series is described in the 'on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences' under the following complicated definition: 'largest prime factor of Stirling numbers of first kind s(n,2)', unstead of the simple one 'largest prime factor in the numerator of harmonic series'. But this identification was not published. 4. About the number 11 The number 11 appears two times in the above harmonic series, so it appears also as a monster, and, moreover, it is the number of dimensions in the supercord theory. So the question : is there a relation tying 11 and 137 ? Indeed :